book review – Read First Chapter.com

Book Review – Frankenstein

Book Title: Frankenstein
Author: Mary Shelly

Description from Amazon.com:

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, generally known as Frankenstein, is a novel written by the British author Mary Shelley. The title of the novel refers to a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who learns how to create life and creates a being in the likeness of man, but larger than average and more powerful. In popular culture, people have tended to refer to the Creature as “Frankenstein”, despite this being the name of the scientist. Frankenstein is a novel infused with some elements of the Gothic novel and the Romantic movement. It was also a warning against the “over-reaching” of modern man and the Industrial Revolution, alluded to in the novel’s subtitle, The Modern Prometheus. The story has had an influence across literature and popular culture and spawned a complete genre of horror stories and films. It is arguably considered the first fully realized science fiction novel.

REVIEW AS A READER:

It was hard to separate the reader and the author in this read because I chose this book to do a gothic study. I saw a video by Tristan and the Classics from YouTube where he suggested reading the top 5 to 10 books in the gothic genre to get a sense of not only what the genre contains, but also how one book led to the other historically. I did just that and Frankenstein was one of the suggested books.

Like many people, I assumed the book was about a monster named Frankenstein. Not so. The scientist’s name is Frankenstein and the monster is his creation.

Knowing that Mary Shelly was only 18 or 20 years old when she wrote this story was shocking to me because the book deals with a deep subject for the times in which she lived. Science had been delving into the issue of where does medicine stop and meddling in God’s handiwork begin. There is always a certain amount of fear associated with new scientific discovery. In our day there are those who fear that AI will take over the world. This book was written in the face of some scientific fear that was prevalent in her day.

The book opens with a series of letters that anchor the reader into the time and place this story will unfold. Dr. Frankenstein is fascinated by all things scientific. His family sees that he has talent in this area and they insist he get extended education and experience, which he does.

At first Dr. Frankenstein is motivated by the ability to help people, to affect a positive change in the world. But slowly, this motivate gets twisted into a hunger for the fame and acclaim he will get for being able to rid humanity of illness. In this state of mind, he meats another scientist of his day, who shows him the ropes, so to speak, about doing scientific exploration. It sounded from the book that this type of cutting edge scientific exploration was done in the proverbial “garage labs” — sort of like where Bill Gates and Steve Jobs started out.

I won’t give away any of the details of what happens from this point forward because this is the story. Everyone knows, of course, that he creates this monster that is known world wide by the name of Frankenstein. But there is much more to the story than that.

As a reader, I had the usual struggle of reading “British” idioms and colloquialisms. I get the feeling that I’m missing something at times when I’m reading English writers. There was also the tiny struggle associated with reading a book that was written so long ago. The language changes and it’s easy to miss things. I kept with it. With my Kindle highlighter, I kept track of all the characters and the plot points.

I would say this was a moral gothic tale about mankind overstepping our bounds scientifically. It was also a moral story about how the absence of virtue and living a life based on revenge can destroy people.

I enjoyed the book and did learn a lot about the gothic genre from it. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley was one of the first gothic books, one of the books that launched the gothic genre.

REVIEW BY AUTHOR:

Structurally, the book opened with a series of letters back and forth between I believe Dr. Frankenstein and his sister. I say “I believe” because I find myself not always “sure” of things when it’s a British writer. I don’t know if I’m alone in this, but in any event, the series of letters was a vehicle of dropping information about the backdrop of the story.

I have seen this method used many, many times in books today and always notice what the purpose of the letter-structure is. It added a bit of interest and intrigue into layout out the backdrop of the drama that was about to unfold.

The next part of the book reveals Dr. Frankenstein as quite a young man. He is filled with excitement and an unquenchable thirst for scientific knowledge. As stated earlier, he had all the best intentions in the beginning, but somewhere during his “forming” as a scientist, his ego took over and he stepped over the line. He develops the ability to give life to the lifeless and decides to create a man — I mean, why not? Well, it doesn’t go exactly as expected.

The main story is about how this experiment affected the creature as well as Dr. Frankenstein. The doctor’s knowledge stopped at how to create a creature, but he didn’t know how to care for and love a creature.

From a Christian perspective, his ego led him down the path of arrogance. He is overconfident and this blinds him to the fact that he has now crossed the line into “God’s domain”, the creation of life. As just stated, although he was able to give life to this creature, he wasn’t able to care for him or provide a world where anyone could care for him. It shows the limitations of mankind and the disaster that occurs when arrogant men play God.

The story is about what happens to Dr. Frankenstein, his family and the creature. It is also a statement, although very subtle, of how the absence of virtue mixed with an obsession for vengeance can destroy a person’s life, even their family’s lives.

Again, as an author, I couldn’t help but be so impressed with what young Mary Shelly was capable of not only understanding but her ability to craft a story around some very difficult issues.

It is a must read for anyone interested in the gothic genre. I would highly recommend it.

SOME MEMORABLE QUOTES FROM THE PATIENT:

“. . . but it is the custom of the Irish to hate villains”
“I pursued him, and for many months this has been my task. Guided by a slight clue, I followed the windings of the Rhone, but vainly . . .”
“She was a hired nurse, the wife of one of the turnkeys, and her countenance expressed all those bad qualities which often characterize that class.”

MY FAVORITE TURN OF PHRASES:

She perished on the scaffold as a murderess.
. . . sudden turn of a promontory, flourishing vineyards with green sloping banks and a meandering river and populous towns occupy the scene.
The soil was barren scarcely affording pasture for a few miserable cows and oatmeal for its inhabitants, which consisted of five persons, whose gaunt and scaggy limbs gave tokens of their miserable fare.
. . . hardly conscious of its extreme profundity until my ear was arrested by the paddling of oars near the shore . . .
A few fishing vessels alone specked the water
the gentle breeze wafted the sound of voices as the fisherman called to one another.
. . . astonishment was exhibited in my countenance,
. . . languishing in death, the dark orbs nearly covered by the lids and the long black lashes that fringed them;
He wished me to seek amusement in society. I abhorred the face of man.
The murderous mark of the fiend’s grasp was on her neck . . .
wandering ministers of vengeance
I now related my history briefly but with firmness and precision, marking the dates with accuracy and never deviating into invective or exclamation.
Everything was silent except the leaves of the trees, which were gently agitated by the wind; the night was nearly dark, and the scene would have been solemn and affecting even to an uninterested observer.
He had heard my story with that half kind of belief that is given to a tale of spirits and supernatural events;

Book Review – The Patient

Book Title: The Patient
Author: Jasper DeWitt

Description from Amazon.com:

The Silent Patient by way of Stephen King: Parker, a young, overconfident psychiatrist new to his job at a mental asylum miscalculates catastrophically when he undertakes curing a mysterious and profoundly dangerous patient.

In a series of online posts, Parker H., a young psychiatrist, chronicles the harrowing account of his time working at a dreary mental hospital in New England. Through this internet message board, Parker hopes to communicate with the world his effort to cure one bewildering patient.We learn, as Parker did on his first day at the hospital, of the facility’s most difficult, profoundly dangerous case—a forty-year-old man who was originally admitted to the hospital at age six. This patient has no known diagnosis. His symptoms seem to evolve over time. Every person who has attempted to treat him has been driven to madness or suicide.

Desperate and fearful, the hospital’s directors keep him strictly confined and allow minimal contact with staff for their own safety, convinced that releasing him would unleash catastrophe upon the outside world. Parker, brilliant and overconfident, takes it upon himself to discover what ails this patient and finally cure him. But from his first encounter with the mysterious patient, things spiral out of control and, facing a possibility beyond his wildest imaginings, Parker is forced to question everything he thought he knew.

Fans of Sarah Pinborough’s Behind Her Eyes and Paul Tremblay’s The Cabin at the End of the World will be riveted by Jasper DeWitt’s astonishing debut.

REVIEW AS A READER:

I researched “best psychological thrillers” on Bard.google.com and this book, The Patient, came up as number one. I read through the Amazon description, but I chose it based on Bard’s recommendation.

The psychological mystery and drama started from the first page. The mystery was subtle at first, but it was definitely there. I was hooked and wanted to know more from the first page. The story unfolded slowly but it was never boring.

Reading the book was like driving on long winding roads, not knowing the ultimate destination, and also not being sure what lay right around the bend. The drama moved along without stop. The story never sagged or drove off onto some boring side road. The mystery and suspense were constant.

There was an intimacy in the story as some of it was written in first person. Other parts were written in third person where the story took on more of a bird’s eye view and a bit of narration. It all worked and added to the mystique of the book.

I did feel that at the end of the book, the ending veered off into a bit of unexpected sci-fi or fantasy I was not expecting, but it was still an enjoyable book from start to finish.

REVIEW BY AUTHOR:

The book was written well, and I highlighted several phrases that were memorable. I have them listed below. I learned a lot about presenting a psychological drama for the reader and how to subtly suggest that there was something “off” about people, places and/or things.

I learned about weaving the psychological plotline into the mystery itself as I did notice that there needed to be a timeline that coincided with someone’s hospitalization. I always thought of psychological suspense stories as one kind of book, but I learned from reading The Patient that a crime/mystery timeline supported the story and the psychological elements weaved all throughout this spinal timeline. I found this very helpful as an author myself.

I also learned about how “withholding information from the reader” worked in a psychological mystery. I always feel obligated to reveal everything to the reader, but this is not necessary. Withholding some parts of the truth add to the ultimate surprise and satisfaction of the reader. It’s not dishonesty, but rather more of a slight of hand for the benefit of the story.

This story was very original. It didn’t read like a remake of some other popular novel — at least I didn’t see anything like that. The originality of the storyline, as well as the unwrapping of the greater mystery, held my interest the entire way, to the last page.

I would recommend this book to any reader of psychological mysteries. I would even recommend this to medical mystery readers.

SOME MEMORABLE QUOTES FROM THE PATIENT:

“. . . her voice carrying a faint lilt that I recognized as Irish,”
“So forcing my frustration down to a simmer, I gave him the most deferential nod I could manage. It seemed to appease him.”
“This was the sort of place where pain of any kind was either flushed out with medication and trips to boutique psychiatrists or kept at a respectable distance with copious expenditures. It was, in short, a place where anything unpleasant, let alone a supernatural horror, had been ruthlessly gentrified out of sight and out of mind.”
“He spun around with military precision . . .”
“She had a kindness to her, but it was girded with such naturally aristocratic steel that I imagined she’s been born ringing a bell to summon servants.”

Book Review – The Last Sceance

Name: The Last Séance
Author: Agatha Christie
Short Story: 33 pages

Description from Amazon: Raoul Daubreuil insists his fiancée give up her activities as a talented and successful medium when they marry. However, he agrees to attend what is to be her last séance—with Madame Exe. But even Raoul can’t foresee the tragedy ahead.

Review as a Reader:

This was a short story and a quick read. I’m not usually a reader of short stories but I chose to read one by Agatha Christie before taking on another novel. The last Christie novel I started to read was a Hercule Poirot novel. He’s not my favorite character and part of the problem is he’s too British. I find myself not understanding a lot of what Hercule says and it was a struggle because of the differences in idioms, etc. I gave up reading the Hercule novel because I felt like I was losing the plot too often.

But The Last Séance was a quick and easy read. It allowed me to clean my reading palate after the Poirot experience. Although this short story was enjoyable, it didn’t have any profound message and none of the characters lingered after finishing the novel.

Review as an Author:

Going into the book, I was looking for tips on writing short stories in general. What I learned after finishing the book was that this short story circled one event and only one event. The characters in this book were one dimensional. I’m assuming creating more complex characters may be hard due to the short story format, but I believe a two-dimensional character would be possible. I’m wondering if short stories in general are more “plot-driven” and this one-event format is how it works.

I have read a few gothic short stories previous to this one and I sense that genre allows for a bit more characterization, especially if there is a psychological plotline.

So all in all, it’s my opinion that The Last Séance was written very well, like all of the Christie books. I learned a bit about the shorter plotline used in short stories and the book was enjoyable. I would recommend this book to someone who is going on a trip and needs something quick and easy to read where there may be a lot of distractions. It wasn’t hard to follow. The plotline is simple but enjoyable. I would also recommend this to any caretakers who are waiting in a doctor’s office, etc. as this can be read in one sitting.

Writer’s Diary – Book Review – Dead for Good

WHAT I LEARNED READING Dead for Good by Stacy Claflin with Nolon King:

I left a five star review as the book was well worth the read. It was well written, the prose was good and easy to read. This book held my interest and the action started on Page 1.

I would classify this book as a psychological thriller. What I found most clever about the book is that all of the suspense was inside the family home, with a little help from some outside neighbors. The plotline was very believable and it worked throughout the story.

The author/authors created characters who had a lot to do during the story but also had a lot of depth to them as well.

The only criticism I have is that the ending was not so much a twist as more of a ‘out of nowhere’ kind of resolution. There was no real foreshadowing of the dual side to the culprit. I will keep it very vague in case anyone reading this would want to read the book, which I would highly recommend.

I’m no expert on plot twists, but most of the YouTube Teachers suggest that a surprise ending needs to be foreshadowed somewhere in the story, so the reader says, ah, yes, I should have seen that. That is the one thing I didn’t really feel in this read. I felt the true culprit kind of just popped up in the end to surprise the reader but wasn’t foreshadowed in any way.

That was my only criticism. I still gave this book a 5 star on Amazon because I believe my criticism only came from me being an author and looking for these things. My guess from the reviews on this book is that normal readers didn’t even catch the lack of foreshadowing I’m referring to here. The character was written into the beginning of the story, and that was enough for the normal readers.

This was also a great psychological thriller without having a psychiatrist or psychologist in the plot. The whole thing worked well within the one family.

MY FAVORITE TURN OF PHRASES:

~ We’re in this together. Always and forever.

~ People tended to only focus on the good in the deceased as if death automatically diluted the truth.

SUMMARY:

I highly recommend Dead for Good. It gets high marks for great plot, great characters and readability. This book’s action started literally on Page 1 and kept up until the very end. It didn’t sag once.